THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MULTIPARITY, PELVIC STATIC DISORDER AND PHYSICAL EFFORT-RELATED URINARY INCONTINENCE

This is an automatically generated default intro template – please do not edit.

	Read full article
Article Title:	THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MULTIPARITY, PELVIC STATIC DISORDER AND PHYSICAL EFFORT-RELATED URINARY INCONTINENCE
Authors:	Saleh Atef
Affiliation:	University of Oradea, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy
Abstract:	Multiparity predisposes many women to pelvic floor pathology, which is probably the most common disorder of adult women showing up in statistics of cardiovascular disease, depression or osteoporosis. We are in front of a growing number of ailments widely linked with symptoms, sometimes debilitating, difficult to be accepted by patients, which includes: urinary incontinence, vaginal prolapse, impaired filling and emptying of the bladder and sexual disorders. International continence Society defines incontinence as a symptom of involuntary loss of urine (Abrams P, Cardozo). Urinary incontinence is a worldwide public health problem with major social and economic impact, having approximately 10 million patients from 10% to 35% of adults and at least 1.5 million of people institutionalized from the United States. (Fantl et al, 1996). According to the outcome of the Norwegian study EPINCOT / HUNT, the largest European study on urinary incontinence, 20% of women reported symptoms of physical effort-related incontinence, similar values to those reported by OMNIBUS survey in Romania. Based on these epidemiological data, knowing the impact of both giving multiple birth naturally on the pelvic floor muscles and pelvic urogenital organs, we proposed to shine some light on this by reflecting this less discussed problem in a conservative society and the society of my country, YEMEN.
Keywords:	multiparity, urinary incontinence, pelvic static disorders
References:	1-De Lancey JO. Surgical anatomy of the female pelvis. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD, eds. Te Linde’s Operative Gynecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 1997:63–93. 2- Redman JF. Surgical anatomy of the female genitourinary system. In: Buchsbaum HJ, Schmidt JD, eds. Gynecologic and Obstetric Urology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders 1993:25–60. 3- Tanagho EA. Anatomy of the lower urinary tract. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED, eds. Campbell’s Urology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders 1992:40–69. 4- De Lancey JOL, Richardson AC. Anatomy of genital support. In: Hurt WG, ed. Urogynecologic Surgery. Gaithersburg, IL; Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers 1992:19–33. 5- Baden WF, Walker T. The anatomy of uterovaginal support. In: Baden WF, Walker T, eds. Vaginal Defects. Philadelphia: Lippincott 1992:25–50. 6- Sandip P., Rodney A., Petter K., Shlomo R., Anterior Vaginal Suport, In: Female urology, urogynecology and voiding dysfunction: Dekker 2005:3-20. 7- Raz S, Little NA, Juma S. Female urology. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED, eds. Campbell’s Urology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1992:2782–2829. 8- Strohbehn K. Normal pelvic floor anatomy. Obstet Gyn Clin North Am 1998; 25:683–705 9-Bumbu G., Urinary Incontinence on physical effort., Treated with urology ,vl 4 Edit.Medicală,2008;3005-3031.
*Correspondence: