CRDs: CAST OR PREFABRICATED? PART I

CRDs: CAST OR PREFABRICATED? PART I

This is an automatically generated default intro template – please do not edit.


General information


Title: CRDs: CAST OR PREFABRICATED? PART I
Meta keywords:
Meta description:

Images information


Images path absolute: /home/jmedarr/public_html/images/stories/com_form2content/p2/f328
Images path relative: com_form2content/p2/f328
Thumbs path absolute:
Thumbs path relative:

Fields information


Article_Title: CRDs: CAST OR PREFABRICATED?
Authors: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Valeria Covrig, Lect. Dr. Ardelean Gavrilă Liviu, Assist. Lupulescu Teodora Eva, PhD candidate
Affiliation: “VASILE GOLDIŞ’’ WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF ARADFACULTY OF MEDICINE, PHARMACY AND DENTISTRY
DENTISTRY AND DENTAL TECHNOLOGY
Abstract: Dentistry is often confronted with damaged teeth which patients wish to keep in their oral cavity for restoration. Of the same opinion are practitioners who know that a recovered root is better than nothing or an implant. The prosthetic recovery method is called coronal substitution and is currently carried out in two strokes, with the aid of a coronal-radicular device and a total coverage crown, which requires collaboration with the dental laboratory. Failures, clinical rebound, as well as progress made in this field, have led to the appearance of prefabricated CRDs, thus reducing demand for cast metallic CRDs. This research seeks to establish whether cast CRDs are more useful and what types of prefabricated CRDs are convenient for use. The article will present theoretical data resulting from lengthy clinical experience and cases solved with four types of CRDs: cast metallic, prefabricated metallic Dentatus, prefabricated from carbon fibers and glass fibers. The actual tests shall be discussed in other articles.
Keywords: KEYWORDS: damaged tooth, cast CRD, prefabricated CRD.
References: 1. Bratu, R. Nussbaum- Bazele clinice şi tehnice ale protezării fixe, Editura Signata, Timişoara, 2000.
2. Bratu Dorin. Materiale dentare în cabinetul de stomatologie. Editura Helicon, Timişoara, 1998.
3. Covrig Valeria. Restaurarea dinţilor cu tratament endodontic, Ed. Signata, Timişoare, 2000.
4. Covrig Valeria . Proteza fixă unidentară- Curs pentru anul III ,, Vasile Goldiş,, Unuverity press 2001
5. Irfan Ahmad UK. Reataşarea şi reconstrucţia incisivilor centrali maxilari fracturaţi. Cosmetic dentistry an IV, nr. 3: 14-21, septembrie 2011.
6. Irfan Ahmad. Compobond: Evoluţia unui nou material dentar restaurativ. Cosmetic dentistry an IV, nr. 4: 21-32, octombrie 2011.
7. Nussbaum R. Afecţiunile coronare ale dinţilor şi tratamentul lor protetic. Microproteze , Lito IMT 1986.
8. Pereira Leandro. Microchirurgia periapicală utilizată pentru îndepărtarea unui instrument endodontic fracturat. Cosmetic dentistry an IV, nr. 2: 14-17, aprilie 2011.
9. Rândaşu I. Proteze dentare. Editura Medicală, Bucureşti 1987.
10. Weber Julian, UK, Pierre Machtou, Wihelm Pertot, Franţa, Sergio Kutter, Clifford Ruddle, John West SUA: Sistemul WaveOne format dintr-un ac de reciprocitate. Cosmetic dentistry an IV, nr. 3: 08-13, septembrie 2011.
Read_full_article: pdf/vol17/iss1-4/2 JMA 2014 CRDs CAST OR PREFABRICATED.pdf
Correspondence:

Read full article
Article Title: CRDs: CAST OR PREFABRICATED?
Authors: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Valeria Covrig, Lect. Dr. Ardelean Gavrilă Liviu, Assist. Lupulescu Teodora Eva, PhD candidate
Affiliation: “VASILE GOLDIŞ’’ WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF ARADFACULTY OF MEDICINE, PHARMACY AND DENTISTRY
DENTISTRY AND DENTAL TECHNOLOGY
Abstract: Dentistry is often confronted with damaged teeth which patients wish to keep in their oral cavity for restoration. Of the same opinion are practitioners who know that a recovered root is better than nothing or an implant. The prosthetic recovery method is called coronal substitution and is currently carried out in two strokes, with the aid of a coronal-radicular device and a total coverage crown, which requires collaboration with the dental laboratory. Failures, clinical rebound, as well as progress made in this field, have led to the appearance of prefabricated CRDs, thus reducing demand for cast metallic CRDs. This research seeks to establish whether cast CRDs are more useful and what types of prefabricated CRDs are convenient for use. The article will present theoretical data resulting from lengthy clinical experience and cases solved with four types of CRDs: cast metallic, prefabricated metallic Dentatus, prefabricated from carbon fibers and glass fibers. The actual tests shall be discussed in other articles.
Keywords: KEYWORDS: damaged tooth, cast CRD, prefabricated CRD.
References: 1. Bratu, R. Nussbaum- Bazele clinice şi tehnice ale protezării fixe, Editura Signata, Timişoara, 2000.
2. Bratu Dorin. Materiale dentare în cabinetul de stomatologie. Editura Helicon, Timişoara, 1998.
3. Covrig Valeria. Restaurarea dinţilor cu tratament endodontic, Ed. Signata, Timişoare, 2000.
4. Covrig Valeria . Proteza fixă unidentară- Curs pentru anul III ,, Vasile Goldiş,, Unuverity press 2001
5. Irfan Ahmad UK. Reataşarea şi reconstrucţia incisivilor centrali maxilari fracturaţi. Cosmetic dentistry an IV, nr. 3: 14-21, septembrie 2011.
6. Irfan Ahmad. Compobond: Evoluţia unui nou material dentar restaurativ. Cosmetic dentistry an IV, nr. 4: 21-32, octombrie 2011.
7. Nussbaum R. Afecţiunile coronare ale dinţilor şi tratamentul lor protetic. Microproteze , Lito IMT 1986.
8. Pereira Leandro. Microchirurgia periapicală utilizată pentru îndepărtarea unui instrument endodontic fracturat. Cosmetic dentistry an IV, nr. 2: 14-17, aprilie 2011.
9. Rândaşu I. Proteze dentare. Editura Medicală, Bucureşti 1987.
10. Weber Julian, UK, Pierre Machtou, Wihelm Pertot, Franţa, Sergio Kutter, Clifford Ruddle, John West SUA: Sistemul WaveOne format dintr-un ac de reciprocitate. Cosmetic dentistry an IV, nr. 3: 08-13, septembrie 2011.
*Correspondence: